|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Intara Direct Action
Caldari State
261
   |
Posted - 2013.12.31 20:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote:
Lets lower those numbers shall we.
I'd like to see a maximum of the following per battle:
1 Tank
6 LAV (the are basically only for transport at this point which is perfect and 6 would let the whole team be mobile)
2 DS only one of which may be an ADS
There is really never a need for more than one tank as having even two allows them to ignore the foot soldiers they are supposed to be supporting.
Standard DS are basically just busses so they are not such a concern on the battle field but the air being clogged with ADS (which I have seen in several battles) is a problem.
LAV are pretty perfect where they are right now and should be allowed in numbers sufficient to move the entire team about quickly if everyone feels the need to stay on the ground.
So now you would like to go back to how it was in 1.7 and before with more LAV's then tanks ??? Tanks can carry three team members just like a LAV . Now it will be , who call's their vehicle in first who has the priority . This shows instability and bias as well as limitations , which should be frowned upon . I have played matches where there were 6 tanks on the field , fielded by the enemy and that to me is just something that should be handled by the team that faces that circumstance .
Someone mentioned before that those who choose to stay with their choice of AR instead of changing to equipment that would destroy or deter the opponents tanks , should have to deal with getting slaughtered . It's not the fact that A.V. is underpowered but it is underutilized as an option . Instead of whining about how mismatched things are ... try doing something about it instead of complaining and begin to field FG's and SLers . That might actually make a difference and after you have quelled the tank menace then you can change back to your
If it's one tank then it should be one of every other vehicle as well . None should be looked upon as being more of an asset or important than any other if this is a fair game and you would like to measure out justice .
" BANE " of ALL vehicle users , Crush , Kill and Destroy ALL vehicles !!!!!
|
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Intara Direct Action
Caldari State
267
|
Posted - 2014.01.01 05:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
TheEnd762 wrote:Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:If it's one tank then it should be one of every other vehicle as well . None should be looked upon as being more of an asset or important than any other if this is a fair game and you would like to measure out justice . Um, no. Which vehicle is the most durable? How about the most deadly? Least likely to flip over? Only needs one person to drive and shoot effectively? The only thing LAVs have over tanks is they're smaller targets that can get closer to objectives on some maps (since tanks are now almost as fast, if not FASTER than LAVs in some cases); and the only thing dropships have is getting on top of and over things since they can FLY. You put 2 or even 3 LAVs or dropships up against a single tank, and the tank is going to win 9/10 times, unless the pilot is a complete idiot, or it's a militia tank going up against assault dropships, and even then, it would be close.
Did you NOT get what I was getting at ???? I was speaking on behalf of tank users like I always do .
It seems that you didn't understand what I said .
" BANE " of ALL vehicle users , Crush , Kill and Destroy ALL vehicles !!!!!
|
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Intara Direct Action
Caldari State
269
|
Posted - 2014.01.01 21:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
TheEnd762 wrote:Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:TheEnd762 wrote:Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:If it's one tank then it should be one of every other vehicle as well . None should be looked upon as being more of an asset or important than any other if this is a fair game and you would like to measure out justice . Um, no. Which vehicle is the most durable? How about the most deadly? Least likely to flip over? Only needs one person to drive and shoot effectively? The only thing LAVs have over tanks is they're smaller targets that can get closer to objectives on some maps (since tanks are now almost as fast, if not FASTER than LAVs in some cases); and the only thing dropships have is getting on top of and over things since they can FLY. You put 2 or even 3 LAVs or dropships up against a single tank, and the tank is going to win 9/10 times, unless the pilot is a complete idiot, or it's a militia tank going up against assault dropships, and even then, it would be close. Did you NOT get what I was getting at ???? I was speaking on behalf of tank users like I always do . It seems that you didn't understand what I said . No, you were saying all vehicles should be considered equal, if and when it comes to vehicle limits. And I said, no, that's stupid, because tanks ARE a much more exploitable asset in battle, and therefor can NOT be counted as equal to LAVs or dropships.
So YOU would like to go back in time as well ??? All I'm saying is when you read someone's words , like yours and the OP's for instance , you can tell that there is preferential treatment towards LAV's and Dropships . Just like it's been for a while now and now with this patch drop things have changed and like always , most are afraid of change .
I say again , no vehicle is no more important than any other . If you place restrictions on one than there should be restrictions on all .
" BANE " of ALL vehicle users , Crush , Kill and Destroy ALL vehicles !!!!!
|
|
|
| |
|